This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

Cameltoe discovered in PUBG. SJW's outraged and call for it's removal.

  • Topic Archived
You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
  1. Boards
  2. PC
  3. Cameltoe discovered in PUBG. SJW's outraged and call for it's removal.

User Info: xpiritflare

xpiritflare
4 months ago#71
DaedalusEx posted...
Where are the complaints about male bulges?

It won't ever happen and that's what makes all these ordeals so funny or sad depending on your perspective.
Yeah. "I'm going to turn back time an hour. It'll take about an hour." - AnnaBananaa

User Info: KillerTruffle

KillerTruffle
4 months ago#72
DaedalusEx posted...
Huh? The character model is depicting a human female. Human females have vaginas.

Nice way to ignore the *actual* point to defend your own perviness. Human females do not frequently/commonly run around with pants so tight that a full outline of every little ridge is visible. Does it happen? Sure, occasionally. It's nowhere near common though, no other female models in the game have that detail, it provides exactly zero influence on the actual gameplay, and no purpose is served by it being in the game. Just because some woman here or there might wear something tight enough to show their goods, that does not equate to logical reasoning for including it in a game like PUBG.

DaedalusEx posted...
Where are the complaints about male bulges?

You mean like complaints that popped up when Rust suddenly brought in full-blown dangling nudity? But regardless, that's totally irrelevant. Just because you or someone else may not find X offensive, that is in no way grounds to argue that nobody has a right to find Y offensive either.

DaedalusEx posted...
that masculinity is evil, and that looking at a woman's body with sexual desire is somehow wrong. Displaying the outline of a woman's genitals through her underwear sexualizes her, and that's a no-no to feminists, which is why it had to be "fixed."

While there are certainly some feminists that go that far, you've missed the actual problem most of them have - it's that women are sexualized in a way that objectifies them, and being reduced to a sexual object that exists only for male gratification, as opposed to a full-fledged person, is hugely demeaning. The majority of women have no problem with being found attractive, etc. - most of them dress the way they do because they do want to be found attractive. That does *not* mean they're OK with being objectified though - wolf whistles, cat calls, brazenly approaching them and expecting them to immediately give in to your sexual advances (these things happen - all the time... ask pretty much any girl), or even arguing that it's fine to take upskirt photos if a girl is wearing clothing that allows for it... ALL of that crap objectifies women. The whole point you and all the other gamerbros keep missing is that they are much more than just a sex object for you to get off to/on.

And in the case of a game, if none of the other female characters in the game have that detail, again, there is no logical argument for including it on one, while there is a decent argument against it - it serves no legitimate purpose in the game other than to objectify women.
"How do I get rid of a Trojan Horse?" -Sailor_Kakashi
"Leave it outside the gates of Troy overnight." -Davel23

User Info: Orestes417

Orestes417
4 months ago#73
You know the great thing about escapist entertainment? You don't need a reason to justify the inclusion or exclusion of anything. Some folks in the world need that fact hammered through their skulls with a 16lb dead-blow sledge.
When nothing remains everything becomes possible.

User Info: KillerTruffle

KillerTruffle
4 months ago#74
ImaPC posted...
I also said I didn't care if the camel toe was there or not, and it wasn't a big deal to me. Maybe you would have seen that if you bothered to read my posts. Obviously we have a differing opinion here, which is fine, but you decide to come at me with some B.S. like "You not see enough of the real thing and mommy monitors your computer, so this is the closest thing you have to porn?" Kinda says a lot about you, and what type of guy you are...

Natural reaction to guys (I've noticed it's never girls that argue the points you're making) who immediately turn every incident like this into a war between games and SJWs. Yeah, I agree they go too far sometimes. Sarkeesian is a good example - she pulls lies out of thin air pretty regularly. However, the fact that some do go too far or get carried away doesn't mean they don't have a point. And there are some legitimate grounds for some of their points, and legitimate grounds against some. But instead of a knee-jerk overreaction like this topic was, and turning it into more "SJWs are destroying mah games" bulls***, treat each incident separately.

Yes, game content has been changed because of SJWs sometimes. It's already happened, and will probably happen again. That does not mean that every complaint is invalid, or an attack on you, or an attack on gaming. How - really - have your games been ruined by changes as a result of this so-called SJW war?

Culture is changing whether you like it or not - and not just in games. Women are finally starting to stand up for themselves, and honestly, I figure it's probably overdue. That doesn't mean you have to stop appreciating pretty girls, or being attracted to them, but it does mean that behaviors and attitudes that treat them as objects are no longer OK. If you're (I don't mean you specifically, but the generalized, collective you) not able to differentiate between attraction and objectification, I'm sorry... that makes you part of the problem, and lashing out at game companies who maybe do understand the difference and try to adapt does nothing but shine light on the problem and make you sound like an ass.
"How do I get rid of a Trojan Horse?" -Sailor_Kakashi
"Leave it outside the gates of Troy overnight." -Davel23

User Info: arleas

arleas
4 months ago#75
This is just like all the people being upset about Tracer in Overwatch... So? Who cares? Someone complains because they feel empowered by making the developer remove it. YAY PROGRESS! 😉👌
http://steamsignature.com/profile/english/76561197969913402.png http://i.imgur.com/VHKOxqN.png
FC: 3325-5440-8407 Dream Code:5E00-0013-7C61

User Info: Yadxov

Yadxov
4 months ago#76
Secular puritans.

User Info: Cool_Dude667

Cool_Dude667
4 months ago#77
SchoolRumble posted...
i've found majority of male sjw are laughable betas, i wonder why that is lol. anyway ya people need to calm down. i doubt anyone would say anything to someone who had a cameltoe in real life, i see them all the time, whys it such a big deal in a video game like grow up kids, there are more reasonable things to be outraged at

Beta/Alpha male doesnt exist btw, look it up if you don't believe me. The whole alpha male/beta male wolf pack stuff was fake, even the original researcher denounced his own study after he went back into the wild for a longer research paper.

in essence only dumb cucks use alpha/beta male
Not changing this sig until Christ returns -- Started 30 A.D
3770K @ 4.2Ghz | 16GB Corsair Vengeance | GTX 670 SLi

User Info: Orestes417

Orestes417
4 months ago#78
arleas posted...
This is just like all the people being upset about Tracer in Overwatch... So? Who cares? Someone complains because they feel empowered by making the developer remove it. YAY PROGRESS! 😉👌


You know, the funny thing is I see far more shaming coming from the folks claiming to argue for empowerment than I do from the other side. Yay, they're fighting to end objectification but christ forbid someone decide to project an image they don't find agreeable. Why is that? Probably because it's not about empowerment at all for a lot of them, but instead about imposing their own sense of morality on the world.
When nothing remains everything becomes possible.

User Info: EliteGuard99

EliteGuard99
4 months ago#79
Who while doing this in PUBG thought this was a good idea?

I mean are people that dumb?
"Sessions is like what would happen if a really sheltered home school kid did the fusion dance with everyone's racist thanksgiving uncle" - D_Bart

User Info: KillerTruffle

KillerTruffle
4 months ago#80
Orestes417 posted...
You know the great thing about escapist entertainment? You don't need a reason to justify the inclusion or exclusion of anything. Some folks in the world need that fact hammered through their skulls with a 16lb dead-blow sledge.

Exactly. While there's no logical reason for including something like that in PUBG, they don't need to excuse having it in there. But likewise, they don't need to excuse pulling it once it's pointed out to them. This is not "SJWs destroying mah games."
"How do I get rid of a Trojan Horse?" -Sailor_Kakashi
"Leave it outside the gates of Troy overnight." -Davel23
  1. Boards
  2. PC
  3. Cameltoe discovered in PUBG. SJW's outraged and call for it's removal.

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived