This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

Cameltoe discovered in PUBG. SJW's outraged and call for it's removal.

  • Topic Archived
You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
  1. Boards
  2. PC
  3. Cameltoe discovered in PUBG. SJW's outraged and call for it's removal.

User Info: JKatarn

JKatarn
4 months ago#61
ArkonBlade posted...
I don't know why these devs just don't tell these cucks to just piss off and don't buy the game if they don't like it. They are the minority in gaming and nobody likes them.


Actually, people who care about this crap either way are the minority in gaming. Is the inclusion/exclusion of T&A etc. REALLY going to affect the gameplay of a given game? Also, using terms like "cuck" and "beta" etc. just makes you sound like a pathetic man-child.
Asus P8Z68-V LE | Core i7 2600K | 8GB G.Skill Ripjaws DDR3 | EVGA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
PS3 | PS2 | PSP| Wii-U | 3DS | DS | X-Box 360 | X-Box | NES
Lord illogical hawk 4 months ago#62
I'm more curious why any development time was spent modeling and implementing that in the first place.
America's Army SN: illogical hawk[GFs] ;37 Honor
*~*-=(C)=-GS SWAT:S.W.A.T. Wizard-=(C)=-*~*

User Info: pothocket

pothocket
4 months ago#63
Lord illogical hawk posted...
I'm more curious why any development time was spent modeling and implementing that in the first place.


Because they spent zero time modeling it. It's a generic asset they purchased from a 3rd party. That's how all of these open-world survival early access games are made and that's why they all look like bland s***.
http://www.koalastothemax.com/?aHR0cDovL2kuaW1ndXIuY29tL3pnMGpYWDcuanBn

User Info: DaedalusEx

DaedalusEx
4 months ago#64
KillerTruffle posted...
there is no logical reason for it to be there


Huh? The character model is depicting a human female. Human females have vaginas. There's no less "logical" reason for it to be there than the bulge on the male character model. Where are the complaints about male bulges?

It gets to something deeper, this idea that modern feminism has been pushing: that masculinity is evil, and that looking at a woman's body with sexual desire is somehow wrong. Displaying the outline of a woman's genitals through her underwear sexualizes her, and that's a no-no to feminists, which is why it had to be "fixed."

The "gamerbros" are upset, I think, because it's yet another example of political agendas influencing their form of entertainment.
Lord illogical hawk 4 months ago#65
DaedalusEx posted...
It gets to something deeper, this idea that modern feminism has been pushing: that masculinity is evil, and that looking at a woman's body with sexual desire is somehow wrong.

That's an odd interpretation of modern feminism, and yeah, what you're describing is about as f***ing creepy as the words you used to describe it, so nice work, a real triumph of descriptive writing there.
America's Army SN: illogical hawk[GFs] ;37 Honor
*~*-=(C)=-GS SWAT:S.W.A.T. Wizard-=(C)=-*~*

User Info: DaedalusEx

DaedalusEx
4 months ago#66
Lord illogical hawk posted...
and yeah, what you're describing is about as f***ing creepy


Looking at women at wanting to f*** them is creepy? In other words, being a normal, healthy heterosexual male is creepy?

Thanks for supporting my point.

User Info: GTL581

GTL581
4 months ago#67
DaedalusEx posted...
Lord illogical hawk posted...
and yeah, what you're describing is about as f***ing creepy


Looking at women at wanting to f*** them is creepy? In other words, being a normal, healthy heterosexual male is creepy?

Thanks for supporting my point.

This could have been worded a little more eloquently, but i agree to an extent. Some people like to act as if having a healthy sex drive/arousal is a bad thing - something which is completely natural in all animals on this planet that sexually reproduce. What's next, shaming people for sneezing?

User Info: Orestes417

Orestes417
4 months ago#68
GTL581 posted...
What's next, shaming people for sneezing?


*ahem* that's biological particulate based microaggression s*** lord. Respect my airspace's pronouns.
When nothing remains everything becomes possible.

User Info: JKatarn

JKatarn
4 months ago#69
pothocket posted...
Lord illogical hawk posted...
I'm more curious why any development time was spent modeling and implementing that in the first place.


Because they spent zero time modeling it. It's a generic asset they purchased from a 3rd party. That's how all of these open-world survival early access games are made and that's why they all look like bland s***.
Asus P8Z68-V LE | Core i7 2600K | 8GB G.Skill Ripjaws DDR3 | EVGA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
PS3 | PS2 | PSP| Wii-U | 3DS | DS | X-Box 360 | X-Box | NES

User Info: ImaPC

ImaPC
4 months ago#70
KillerTruffle posted...
ImaPC posted...
Then you got the creator who just bends over and just apologizes for it. They did nothing wrong. s*** just makes me sick.

Just as they're doing nothing wrong by removing it. It's weird that you would consider altering a *tiny* little detail they may not have even known about to be "bending over"... Why gamerbros have to get so flipping upset about things that have no actual effect whatsoever on the game is beyond me. I think they just like to be pissed all the time, and minor cosmetic tweaks to their games are as good a target as any to get pissed off about.

I'll be the first to admit that some of the SJW campaigns take it too far, to the point of sometimes outright lying to support their criticism of a game. This though, the camel toe is there, it has no effect on gameplay, there is no logical reason for it to be there, it's from an outsourced model that was done two years ago, it has no effect on gameplay, the dev may not have even realized it was in there because he's one dude managing a lot of stuff in the game, it has no effect on gameplay, it is out of place compared to all the other game models, it has the potential to bother some people (obviously), and IT HAS NO f***ING EFFECT ON GAMEPLAY.

Seriously... why are you so bothered they're fixing it? You not see enough of the real thing and mommy monitors your computer, so this is the closest thing you have to porn?

They're not doing anything wrong by removing it, if they were to do it on their own, and not after some people get upset about it.

You know, and like you said, it's such a tiny detail, that is practically invisible at high resolutions. It's not there with pants on, and according to you it has no affect on the gameplay. So why even get upset about it? It's not a big deal.

I'm bothered by it because right now it's a practically invisible camel toe. What's it going to be next time?

Maybe in the future all entertainment should be examined by various social groups with a fine tooth comb, just to be sure there isn't anything that could potentially offend someone. How does that sound? We can just remove anything that doesn't affect the gameplay also. Graphic effects, details on characters, etc. Just remove it all because it doesn't affect the gameplay right?

I also said I didn't care if the camel toe was there or not, and it wasn't a big deal to me. Maybe you would have seen that if you bothered to read my posts. Obviously we have a differing opinion here, which is fine, but you decide to come at me with some B.S. like "You not see enough of the real thing and mommy monitors your computer, so this is the closest thing you have to porn?" Kinda says a lot about you, and what type of guy you are...
  1. Boards
  2. PC
  3. Cameltoe discovered in PUBG. SJW's outraged and call for it's removal.

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived