DF--Dynasty Warriors 9: the lowest performance we've seen on Pro and X1X

  • Topic Archived
You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
  1. Boards
  2. Xbox One
  3. DF--Dynasty Warriors 9: the lowest performance we've seen on Pro and X1X

User Info: Xoned

Xoned
4 months ago#41
b166er01 posted...
Off topic but...is the game any fun?


If you are a die hard fan of the series, yes. If not you may want to skip it, or wait for a deep sale.

User Info: Solis

Solis
4 months ago#42
Nazanir posted...
So the question then becomes, what is so different about this game, compared to other games that have no problems when it comes to performance, that also have big open worlds where lots of things are happening at the same time?

Having hundreds of characters onscreen at one time is certainly a likely reason. I can't imagine how terribly The Witcher 3 or Gears of War 4 would have run if they tried to have as many models visible at once as Dynasty Warriors 9 does.
"Walking tanks must exist somewhere for there to be such attention to detail like this in mech sim." - IGN Steel Battalion review

User Info: THEaircobra

THEaircobra
4 months ago#43
quincy2000a posted...
RetroGamerX posted...
*Looks at tc link*
Dont need to click it to know it will contain...

Blah blah blah etc etc
Blah blah blah
In summary buy the X version

Thanks tc

Nothing wrong with your view...but some gamers are more interested in a more detailed approach...and the extensive evaluations DF provides gives us the more elaborate explanations we seek...


But why do you now only post these when the evaluations are similar or the X1 has something negative?

That's rhetorical. We all know the answer.
GT: aircobra PSN: THEaircobra
https://www.gofundme.com/newhomeforpam - even social media shares help!

User Info: krazykiwikid

krazykiwikid
4 months ago#44
Solis posted...
Nazanir posted...
So the question then becomes, what is so different about this game, compared to other games that have no problems when it comes to performance, that also have big open worlds where lots of things are happening at the same time?

Having hundreds of characters onscreen at one time is certainly a likely reason. I can't imagine how terribly The Witcher 3 or Gears of War 4 would have run if they tried to have as many models visible at once as Dynasty Warriors 9 does.


The difference is Witcher and GoW actually have enemy a.i. Dead Rising series has a f*** ton of enemies on screen (and on par with the a.i from DW) and looks and runs a hell of a lot better than this DW. Hell I'd say the first DR game on 360 looks better than this. This purely comes down to a lazy developer s***ting out a game with no effort put into it.

And yeah lol at how much effort uptown tries convincing people he's not here on a desperate crusade to downplay the X1X.... despite the obvious.
If you wish to make a topic about Xbox One then do so. What happens with the PlayStation has nothing to do with Xbox - Gamefaqs moderator

User Info: Yuri_LowelI

Yuri_LowelI
4 months ago#45
uptown710 posted...
Proof positive that the CPUs on both consoles are no good. Screen tearing abound and horrible framerate. I’m guessing it’s due to having all of those characters on screen at once, combined with the fact that it’s open world.


why does the PC version also run like s***?

it's a poorly optimised game. Period.
http://k09.kn3.net/1256263BF.gif

User Info: Robin_Mask

Robin_Mask
4 months ago#46
Oh look, onscreen there is a dozen of the same soldier in a Warriors game...
My YT: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCC8OmMlZXYXJmAi_f1vvNPg
This Gen: FFX/X-2=FFXIITZA=Witcher 3>DOOM>Cuphead

User Info: HentaiMan

HentaiMan
4 months ago#47
Xbawks won.
https://youtu.be/Xl552rK8Sjo https://i.imgur.com/Mr374Y0.jpg https://i.imgur.com/COylKWt.jpg
Kirby fan <(^.^<) <(^.^)> (>^.^)>

User Info: Xoned

Xoned
4 months ago#48
HentaiMan posted...
Xbawks won.


No. Gamers lose. (They really did a terrible job on this, and that's coming from someone who still likes the game,it's a technical mess.)

User Info: helIy

helIy
4 months ago#49
HentaiMan posted...
You forgot the video Richard
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LwOpIiOeYYk
thx Richard

uptown710 posted...
Proof positive that the CPUs on both consoles are no good. Screen tearing abound and horrible framerate. I’m guessing it’s due to having all of those characters on screen at once, combined with the fact that it’s open world.

Very true. Once again the JAGUAR Jag-off bottleneck shows its face. I am confident that for next gen, Sony and M$ will abandon the tablet-CPU crap and move on to RYZEN or similar.

$ony probably won't, they'll continue to use old architecture, while Microsoft will likely switch to Intel.
i wish you were here.

User Info: helIy

helIy
4 months ago#50
krazykiwikid posted...
. This purely comes down to a lazy developer s***ting out a game with no effort put into it.

no, they put effort in to it, a lot of effort. this is a major departure from normal dw games.

no effort involved and we'd just have a standard dw game with more clones than the last game
i wish you were here.
  1. Boards
  2. Xbox One
  3. DF--Dynasty Warriors 9: the lowest performance we've seen on Pro and X1X

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

Update Topic Flair

You are not allowed to update this topic's flair.

  • Topic Archived