• Topic Archived
You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
  1. Boards
  2. Mortal Kombat
  3. Battle damage looks ugly...

User Info: thepenguin55

thepenguin55
5 years ago#1
Maybe I'm alone on this but I think they should've left the battle damage out of this version. It just looks really crappy in this version. Having said that, if that's the worst thing I can say about this game then I think it's doing pretty good. Lol.

User Info: OriginalGen

OriginalGen
5 years ago#2
The character models in general look pretty bad in comparison. Don't fret over it too much though, but this does prove my point that semi HD graphics aren't as profound as true stereoscopic 3D.
Wii U NNID: Vorash_Kadan

User Info: bigdaddydmac

bigdaddydmac
5 years ago#3
3d in 220p??? No thanks, I'd rather have hardware that has actual advancement. It's hilarious how everyone praised SSF4 for 3ds, but knocks MK Vita. Talk about a fugly game... Compare Blazblue Vita and 3ds or DoA. It's beyond sad that people support a trash handheld like 3ds. If MK vita looks so horrible, just imagine how it'd look on the other portable....ewwww
psn:BigDaddyD-Mac
"Before society can move forward, we all must agree upon the rules! Now Kneel!" -Galvatron
  1. Boards
  2. Mortal Kombat
  3. Battle damage looks ugly...
  • Topic Archived