streamofthesky posted...If I recall correctly, that Justice Dept. memo was written by Clinton's Justice Dept. while he was being scrutinized for the scandal of...having an affair. So the whole thing comes across as sketchy when it comes to being an authoritative legal decision.
The OLC, which wrote the memos (along with two more in the Nixon era) arguing that the president (and vice president) was immune from prosecution, is effectively the President's own private law firm, while the one DoJ memo that argued that the president was
not immune from prosecution was written by Ronald Rotunda - a noted conservative legal scholar - at the behest of Special Counsel Kenneth Starr. So yeah, all four of those memos - the three in favour and one against - all have some level of bias built into them.
Not saying I agree with the findings of the memo, just that it's the most convincing argument I've heard.
streamofthesky posted...I argue they didn't intend for Congress to shield the president from punishment for any possible wrongdoing, either.
Well, that's the thing about democracy - the people get both the government they choose and the government they deserve.
Kill 1 man: You are a murderer. Kill 10 men: You are a monster.
Kill 100 men: You are a hero. Kill 10,000 men, you are a conqueror!