This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
  1. Boards
  2. Religion
  3. How To Get To Heaven When You Die

User Info: LinkFanatic

LinkFanatic
1 month ago#181
Creationism is literally predicated on the default assumption that there's a god; by definition, that's not science. So I'm right.
Islam is Chaos Control.

User Info: PurpleLizard

PurpleLizard
1 month ago#182
xfrodobagginsx posted...
PokemonExpert44 posted...
LinkFanatic posted...
xfrodobagginsx posted...
Evolutionsts don't. They start with the suppostion that evolution is true, then they look for evidence to support it and then HIDE any evidence which refutes it


You mean...exactly like creationists do?


Which creationists have hidden the evidence from anyone? Also, you seem to think that only creationists present only half the story to people, and, distort the evidence to fit their own biased opinions. They don't.

It's not the creationists who are hiding, omitting evidence, it is the evolutionists. They hide/censor anything from textbooks,ect. that contradicts their false theory.


Do you have an example?
1994-0244-1993

User Info: xfrodobagginsx

xfrodobagginsx
1 month ago#183
PurpleLizard posted...
xfrodobagginsx posted...
PokemonExpert44 posted...
LinkFanatic posted...
xfrodobagginsx posted...
Evolutionsts don't. They start with the suppostion that evolution is true, then they look for evidence to support it and then HIDE any evidence which refutes it


You mean...exactly like creationists do?


Which creationists have hidden the evidence from anyone? Also, you seem to think that only creationists present only half the story to people, and, distort the evidence to fit their own biased opinions. They don't.

It's not the creationists who are hiding, omitting evidence, it is the evolutionists. They hide/censor anything from textbooks,ect. that contradicts their false theory.


Do you have an example?


Lots. For instance, the geological strata in the text books is completely different than that in the real earth to make it look like the layers are older than they are. Also, they take a few small bones and look for any slight variation away from the norm and try to create entire new species from it. They have an artist draw a ficticious creature claiming that this is what the creature looked like when they have no way of knowing what it looked like. They won't allow creationists to come speak at colleges and Universities.
#184
(message deleted)

User Info: PurpleLizard

PurpleLizard
1 month ago#185
xfrodobagginsx posted...
They won't allow creationists to come speak at colleges and Universities.


I'm sure they would allow creationists to speak at colleges and universities on whatever subject they had a degree in. This is usually not evolutionary biology, as it so happens.

Lots. For instance, the geological strata in the text books is completely different than that in the real earth to make it look like the layers are older than they are.


No, that's a premise of creationism. That's not evidence for creationism. You're telling me what you believe, not why it's believable.

Also, they take a few small bones and look for any slight variation away from the norm and try to create entire new species from it.


You have absolutely no expertise on what distinguishes one species from another and what criteria scientists are looking at. Neither do most creationists, as it happens.

They have an artist draw a ficticious creature claiming that this is what the creature looked like when they have no way of knowing what it looked like.


Come now. The creature isn't fictional, but the artist's depiction used as a visual is. We know that dinosaurs (whatever those bones are) existed, and we had people draw approximations of them based on the science available. As it turns out, we now know that a lot more of them had feathers than we thought, so a more accurate depiction would have feathers. Obviously, we'll never know exactly what they looked like. But those bones exist, correct? And the natural way for them to get there was that they belonged to an animal. So that animal isn't "fictional."

Did you also know that a lot of images of space put out by NASA are approximations with computer generated artistry involved (the reason I know is that NASA tells me; there's no conspiracy). This is one of the main "evidences" for flat earth. Obviously, this doesn't constitute good evidence.
1994-0244-1993
(edited 1 month ago)

User Info: xfrodobagginsx

xfrodobagginsx
1 month ago#186
Actually, a LOT of Creationists have degrees in Evolutionary Biology and then switch to Creationism and they won't let them speak because they want to silence anyone that they disagree with the same way that Democrats do with everything else.

You asked for examples of how the Evolutionists lie and omit information and I gave you one.

The truth is that if you look at the evolutionists own admission is that they explain why they believe it's a transitional fossil because of some minor detail that varies from the average by a tiny degree. Former Evolutionary Biologist will tell you what they do. They look for these transitions because they get Government Grants for research that keeps them with a paycheck. No findings, no money. So they have to make stuff up such as this new species that came from a few teeth, two toe bone and a small part of a leg bone. All of which could fit into the palm of your hand. They have artists invent species by drawing some imaginary creature to make it look legit.

The creature isn't fictional. The artists drawing is. The truth is that the creature is human. The only variation from human found is in a very slight bend in the angle of the toe. Other than that it's human. Modern humans have these same variations in their toes. You are being lied to.

I never said I believed in Flat Earth, but yes they do point out the CGI on the Flat Earth sites.

User Info: zinformant

zinformant
1 month ago#187
That's one heck of a conspiracy.
Is it naive to dream of a world without war?

User Info: xfrodobagginsx

xfrodobagginsx
1 month ago#188
zinformant posted...
That's one heck of a conspiracy.


Truth is not conspiracy.

User Info: PurpleLizard

PurpleLizard
4 weeks ago#189
xfrodobagginsx posted...
Actually, a LOT of Creationists have degrees in Evolutionary Biology and then switch to Creationism and they won't let them speak because they want to silence anyone that they disagree with the same way that Democrats do with everything else.


Proof?
1994-0244-1993

User Info: xfrodobagginsx

xfrodobagginsx
4 weeks ago#190
PurpleLizard posted...
xfrodobagginsx posted...
Actually, a LOT of Creationists have degrees in Evolutionary Biology and then switch to Creationism and they won't let them speak because they want to silence anyone that they disagree with the same way that Democrats do with everything else.


Proof?


Prove they don't.
  1. Boards
  2. Religion
  3. How To Get To Heaven When You Die