Feral_Thug posted... It's true most people have cell phones, but the picture quality on them is bad, especially if you are trying to photograph a moving animal from a great distance in dimly lit undergrowth.
That was an argument twenty years ago, but it doesn't really fly anymore. Most high-end phones today have cameras better than dedicated cameras even fifteen years ago (with the obvious exception of high-end professional cameras which 99.99% of people don't use anyway)
Feral_Thug posted... Someone could get a picture of one but then critics would come back and say the evidence is unusable because it is dark and blurry. Well even with a real expensive camera that would probably be the case too. Even in daytime I have taken pictures of animals 300+ feet away and due to the zoom the picture is dark, and at that distance the animal moving combined with my hand movements, it's still blurry.
Overlooking that most of these sightings aren't at night, we can get clear images of animals so unless sasquatches are magic, that's a little flimsy.
Feral_Thug posted... For fossils, all I can say is I don't know if many people have done serious fossil searching in the Pacific northwest.
lolwut?
Feral_Thug posted... There are probably tons of dinosaur bones under the forests that have still never been found because it's just not a place people really excavate too deeply, probably due to cost, terrain, and lack of motive.
...not really how fossil records work. Like, at all. Not even in the ballpark.
https://courses.lumenlearning.com/boundless-biology/chapter/evidence-of-evolution/